Wednesday, February 6, 2013

A632.4.5.RB_CliftonEmily


“Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we choose to deceive”, this is something my father used to say to me when I was young. When I gave him my best precocious and puzzled look he told me that it meant that telling lies usually becomes a complicated mess of lies when you have to tell more to cover up them all up. When you reach the end you are usually caught and do not know when or where it all began. I thought my father a fantastic wordsmith; imagine my chagrin when I discovered that it was Sir Walter Scott who wrote those immortal words. Moral of the story: don’t lie…ever.  Now here I am as an adult and I lie all the time; to avoid upsetting someone (“Oh no, that cake wasn’t dry”) or to avoid conflict (“No, I was not checking out that cute bartender”). Often, when entering into negotiations we are not always truthful; there are several negotiation deceptions that occur often. Some are more acceptable than others (wait, what…lying is ok now??). Misrepresentation occurs when a person takes a position on something which is not entirely true, bluffing occurs when there is an indication or insinuation of an action with no intention of follow through, deception is the use of false statements to lead the other party to an inaccurate conclusion, and falsification is lying out and out.

There are a few guidelines you can follow to safeguard yourself from deception while in negotiations:
·         Establish trust If your negotiation partner knows that you are not going to use deception tactics, it is less likely that they will engage in them as well.
·         Ask direct questions: People are less likely to lie is asked questions directly
·         Listen carefully: Listen to what is and is not being said, what questions are being answered and which are not.
·         Pay attention to non-verbal cues: when people lie, they may give non-verbal cues such as changes in breathing, blushing, and blinking or averted eye contact.
(Hoch, Kunreuther, Gunther, 2001, p. 196-197)

When applying for a position with ERAU, the job I was interested in has a Master’s Degree listed as a requirement. I contacted the Human Resources Department to inquire whether this was firm requirement. With the information I was able to pump from one of the recruiters I applied for the job. When I reached the section where education was to be listed I entered in both my Undergraduate Degrees as well as input my MS Leadership information as well leaving the graduation date blank. I was not sure whether it would allow me to proceed with this information missing. It did however; I believe that it passed me through the DSS based on the criteria entered. I followed up with a resume and cover letter where I outlined that while I did not yet have a Masters I was about halfway through with a 4.0 CGPA and I was expected to graduate March of 2014 with distinction. I then outlined how my current experience combined with my anticipated MS would make me an ideal candidate for the position. I misrepresented myself to get my foot in the door and to hopefully make it to the pile of resumes that go across the hiring manager’s desk, but I was honest about my shortcomings in my resume while selling myself on the job.

References:

Hoch, S. J., Kunreuther, H., & Gunther, R. E. (2001). Wharton on making decisions. New York: Wiley.



No comments:

Post a Comment